Today
we live in a world that has unique definitions of gender roles in society.
Recently there has been much discussion on topics such as gay marriage, the breakup
of the family system, and the overall definition of what a man is in the 21st
century. Many of these issues can be traced back to the social movements and
changes that happened during the 1960’s and onward. Because of the women’s
rights movement many women today have equal opportunities in the workplace and
have surpassed men in graduating college. These changes have brought a lot of
benefits to our society because now the female voice has a say in many of the
decisions that go on at home, at the workplace, and in the world. While women
have risen to new prominence in their roles today, men have diminished in theirs.
Men today are more self-centered, less masculine, and have lost their sense of
responsibility. Men of our grandparent’s generation were dependable, took
action, and they defined what it is to be masculine. Popular characters of
their generation like James Bond personified this idea of the alpha male and
masculine traits. He is the man that men want to be, and the man that women
want to be with. While James Bond is a flawed and overtly sexist character, he
does represent a kind of masculinity that men in our society desperately need
right now.
The
first James Bond book was printed in 1953 in a time where the entire world
seemed to be searching for and settling into their new identities. The United
States and the Soviet Union became the new world powers after World War II and
countries like Britain had taken a smaller role in the governance of the world.
The James Bond novels were Ian Fleming’s
answer to the decline of British superiority and they hearkened back to the
glory days of Britain. He was their ultimate hero, a man on Her Majesty’s
Secret Service who could solve the world’s problems without the help of Britain’s
larger cousin the United States. In fact Bond was often the solution to
problems that the U.S. or Soviet Union couldn’t solve on their own and because
of this he was extremely popular in Britain and he soon gained popularity
across the globe. Bond provided escape and excitement to readers in a time of
peace. Long gone were the times when Allied soldiers were fighting against evil
and oppression in all areas of the world. Tales of duty and the fight against
infamy were now found in the James Bond novels. James was a one-man army who
saved the day because of his intellect and physical prowess. He was a man’s man
and of course he always got the girl. Bond wasn’t popular just because he was
every British man’s hero, but because he was every man’s hero. He has timeless
qualities that can be admired in any generation and they are why he has remained
popular to this day.
As
mentioned in the above paragraph the James Bond novels are a form of escapism
and can be categorized under Escape Literature. According to Harmon and Holman’s
A Handbook to Literature Escape
Literature is defined as “Writing whose clear intention is to amuse and beguile
by offering readers a strong world, exciting adventures, or puzzling mysteries.
It aims at no higher purpose than amusement. Adventure stories, detective
stories, tales of fantasy, and many humorous stories are frankly escape
literature, and they exist for no other purpose than to translate readers for a
time from the care ridden actual world to an entrancing world of the
imagination (Harmon and Holman).” The Bond novels are an escape for men because
while we read them we can be in the exciting world of Bond for a few hours. We
can get the beautiful exotic girl, we can travel round the globe, and we can
save the day. All of the fantasies of the male mind are written into the novels
and he represents the epitome of those fantasies. He is just as relevant in the
world today as he was in the 1950’s and we need him now more than ever as men
in our generation further lose sight of the definition of manliness and sink
deeper into states of irresponsibility.
Men
today live often live with their parents longer, wander about aimlessly and
without through college, and they have lost their sense of what is to be a man.
This is reflected in media portrayals of the dumb dad on sitcoms like Married With Children and Family Guy. Our society has even created
a term in the last generation called metrosexual which describes a man who isn’t
homosexual, but adopts the clothing and style of a gay man. What?! Why are
straight men in our society looking to gay fashion trends to define them? As
gender roles in society have changed we have changed. Kids in recent
generations and today have grown up with new definitions of man and woman and
that is obviously reflected. According to a 2010 survey, 19% of men today ages
25 to 29 still live with their parents! The percentage had risen 8% just from
the 1980’s. This was unheard in the time of the Bond novels. Men back then were
the providers of the family. They established themselves, married, and strived
to support their family. It was expected of them to do so. Although not a
family man James Bond certainly had this sense of duty and responsibility about
him. He could have spent his time in idle pursuits; instead he devoted his entire
life to a higher cause which was the protection and safety of the Western
world. Sure he pursued his own interests, but they were always secondary to his
greater mission. Today we find the opposite as men waste their lives away in
video games, the internet, and failing to launch from their parents’ nests.
Men
today also have a problem with the way they treat women. Often we hear the
sayings that “chivalry is dead”. Now James
Bond has been called a sexist womanizer in the past, but he certainly knew how
treat women. There is a reason why so many women are attracted to him and most
of them aren’t fictional. Throughout the novels he compliments women with
phrases like “your one of the most beautiful women I’ve ever seen” in From
Russia With Love and the countless accolades he pours on Moneypenny and his
personal secretary Loelia Ponsonby. All compliments were appreciated. He was
confident and assuring, he pursued his women without looking desperate or needy.
And often times throughout his adventures he even treated his female
counterparts as important assets to his success. This Bond quote from the short
story Quantum of Solace offers some
insight into Bond’s character: “I think it's the same with all the
relationships between a man and a woman. They can survive anything so long as
some kind of basic humanity exists between the two people. When all kindness
has gone, when one person obviously and sincerely doesn't care if the other is
alive or dead, then it's just no good.” That may come as a shock to some who
think of Bond as sexist, misogynist dinosaur.Men in the dating world today
could learn a lot of lessons from 007.
Work Cited
Harmon,
William and C. Hugh Holman. A Handbook to
Literature.
Upper
Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2009.
I appreciated the research you did to back your claims about this generation of young men. Otherwise, it would have been more like a personal essay and not an academic paper.
ReplyDeleteGood job so far! Your transitions are good, your style is logical and easy to read, and you stay on topic. The last paragraph about how Bond treats women is especially interesting, and is backed up by your timely quote!
My only suggestion: sometimes your tone is a little casual/personal. This is of course up to Dr. Burton to judge, but generally academic papers try to avoid the use of first person ("we live in a world") or exclamations ("What?!"). I personally liked it, but you may want to ask Dr. Burton what his expectations are.
Thanks so much I really appreciate the feedback!
ReplyDeleteWhat an awesome paper! The connection you made between Bond and the men of the current generation is so new and fresh. I think you argue your point well and you have the research to back it up. It's interesting because when I think of Bond, I think of a sexist ladies man. I like the perspective you put on it.
ReplyDeleteI really enjoyed reading this. I loved how you addressed the good and addressed the weaknesses that others talk about, like Bond being sexist. Like Leah said, though, I would probably watch how casual some of it is. A little statement occasionally is good to keep the interest of the reader, but too much makes it less persuasive. Best of luck!
ReplyDelete